Although an essential communication skill, listening does not receive the same attention as speaking. As an often-required class, project or professional event, public speaking takes center stage. A person can experience a range of emotions associated with telling their story including shame, anxiety, and frustration but, depending on how they’re being listened to, they may also experience validation, understanding, and empathy. The experience of being listened to and, more to the point, feeling heard can help reduce conflict, decrease physical pain, and foster emotional healing. At times, assuming the posture of listener can feel strenuous. Listening requires conscious effort and focused attention. However, listening serves as a powerful means of learning and connecting emotionally with others. Professionals in the healthcare industry would do well to recognize the positive impact that their nonjudgmental listening presence can provide. Through listening, a group may heal, learn, evolve, and achieve.1 For the individual, research confirms that “the lived experience of being listened to [is] fundamental to quality of life and health.”2 And physician listening serves as “a healing and therapeutic agent” for patients.3
One’s own narrative material serves as the initial source of the idea of self. However, the idea of self more fully emerges as a socially constructed concept created and recreated in the art of communication with the other.4 This occurs within the second person space, or the space between the storyteller, or self, and story listener, or other.5 In the second person space, the story listener’s role becomes more significant, for strengthening the power of the story, alternatively aiding the teller in releasing, rearranging, replacing, or reframing a new one,6 and recognizing the learning that may emerge from the story.
An Argument for Storytelling and Listening
Foundational to the human experience, storytelling and listening allows the sharing of information, communicates emotion, and engenders compassion. Stories provide access to a common humanity. People seek affiliation as an essential part of the human experience and find deeper connections. Hence, the far-reaching application of successful storytelling enjoyed throughout the fields of nursing, community organizing, diversity and inclusion, restorative justice, political activism, and peace building. Experienced in and regulated by the amygdala, storytelling and story listening also serve a biological function.7 Neural coupling, the process by which neural patterns of the storyteller mirror those of the story listener, provides evidence of the hard-wired need and nature of sharing stories. Through neural coupling, the brain of the storyteller aligns itself with the brain of the listener.8 Neuroscience research recently uncovered that social isolation manifests itself in a manner nearly identical to physical pain;9 the feeling of belonging or not belonging impacts one’s sense of well-being.
An inextricable link exists between expressing oneself and listening to stories. Dialogue with others provides one with broader as well as alternate perspectives allowing for the creation of richer interpretations.10 The act of listening moves people closer; “it helps us become more whole, more healthy, more holy.”11 And the opposite may also prove true. Not feeling listened to causes fragmentation, and fragmentation causes suffering.10–11 As an illustration of fragmentation, partisan politics in the national landscape divides Americans and limits rational discourse between members of different parties. Globally, the deterioration of world peace continues for the fourth consecutive year.12 Thich Nhat Hanh, Vietnamese Buddhist Monk and peace activist states:
The secret of creating peace is that when you listen to another person you have only one purpose: to offer him an opportunity to empty his heart. If you are able to keep that awareness and compassion alive in you, then you can sit for 1 hour and listen even if the other person’s speech contains a lot of wrong perceptions, condemnations and bitterness.13
Simply stated, putting emotions and experience into words improves one’s physical and mental health. Having those emotions and experience heard by a listener trained to “lay aside themself”14 may enable the storyteller to feel heard and acknowledged. Having that need met may in turn allow for the fulfillment of higher levels of psychological needs.15 The new field of narrative medicine trains professionals “to acknowledge, absorb, interpret, and act on the stories and plights of others.”16 While much has been written about the “potential qualities, characteristics, and abilities that the role of the sender must possess in order to achieve status as a competent communicator, relatively little information is available for individuals to understand what is required of them in their role of receiver to achieve similar communicative status.”17
Listening as a skill requires purposeful practice to develop, and many consider it an essential component of one’s professional practice.18 Listening happens at 6 different levels determined by one’s goal for the interaction.19 Listening Levels
Through empathic listening, story listeners can help provide storytellers the space to feel heard, thus enabling them to be challenged to reflect from multiple perspectives. Deep meaningful learning can emerge from this process. The next section presents transformative learning as a goal of story listening, and the subsequent sections present examples of structured formats from which to facilitate transformative learning: coaching and Lego Serious Play (LSP).
Transformative Learning
Stories help people make meaning of experiences and the world around them. Embedded in those stories are long-held social constructs—unwittingly made assumptions and habitual ways of thinking. Transformative learning is “learning that transforms problematic frames of references—sets of fixed assumptions and expectations—to make them more inclusive, discriminating, open, reflective, and emotionally able to change.”20 It is often difficult to challenge these “habitual expectations or ‘meaning perspectives’ (created by ideologies, learning styles, neurotic self-deceptions)…that govern the activities of perceiving, comprehending and remembering.”21 However, having a dedicated listener can help us to gain some mental distance from the story and challenge our own meaning-making schemes. Mental distance can enable the story holder to make their story object—to view it from the balcony which enables them to gain a broader perspective.
A storyteller can make their story object by conceptualizing it as a metaphor or building it as an abstract model or other physical metaphor. One can also participate in critical reflection, where one’s assumptions surface for testing and analysis.22 This may enable storytellers to see their own unconscious bias or thinking that comprises their current method of meaning making. Having a dedicated listener provides the teller with a way to hold the story as object so they may reflect upon it, challenge the assumptions underlying and within the story, reshape it, and take control of it.
How the Art of Listening Can Be Used to Coach Storytellers
Coaching, a facilitation method capable of fostering transformative learning, can help storytellers obtain deeper understanding in light of a complex challenge or obstacle, reflect critically upon their assumptions, and achieve strategic insight for informed decision-making and action. A coaching session looks like “a dialogue between a facilitator (coach) and a participant (client) where the majority of interventions used by the facilitator are open [ended] questions which are aimed at stimulating the self-awareness and personal responsibility of the participant”.23 The coach’s role as a facilitator sees them guide self-discovery through shaping open-ended questions, differing from the more directive role a trainer or mentor may take.23 Effective coaching and coaches rely more on the process than the subject matter expertise or experience in the challenge the storyteller faces.
A powerful tool, the ORID framework,24 can aid in the facilitation of a coaching conversation, one-on-one or in group settings. ORID involves 4 stages of open-ended questions. ORID Questioning framework
The effective application of the ORID framework to facilitate a coaching conversation requires the storyteller to begin by sharing their story while the story listener(s) listen, take notes, and write down ORID questions. These questions should enable the storyteller to obtain further understanding on gaps of content, identify assumptions, question assumptions, and think of options/possibilities yet available to the storyteller.25 This provides the space for the storyteller to share without interruption and enables the story listener(s) to reflect and craft meaningful questions. Then, the story listener(s) ask(s) ORID questions (if in a group can be a round robin format) in an attempt to guide the storyteller through the 4 stages. The goal of the listener is to facilitate the storyteller achieving their own insights (not a directed answer or solution) and to make an informed decision on next steps. Although the framework denotes an ordered process, authentic discourse does not follow such a structure. An organic conversation proves a more impactful application of the model. The storyteller receives the supports and challenges needed to achieve insight through the listening and inquiry of the coach. The storyteller may then take personal ownership of and action on their new perspective.
LEGO as Transformative
The LSP methodology enables participants to solve wicked problems through strategy and/or team development. However, many also use this method—in unique ways and with great success—for facilitating learning.26 It has the potential to produce more significant learning through the creation of metaphors in the form of LEGO models. The LSP encompasses multiple methods recognized to foster transformative learning, including the power of play, building metaphors, engaging in critical reflection, sharing in storytelling, and sparking the imagination. The potential for transformative learning in this method stands ready to expand the way in which one makes meaning.27
Building New Stories
The play portion of LSP (ie, building Lego models) activates a positive affect, potentially leading to the psychological state of flow, or the optimal state for human experience/performance where creativity, productivity, and happiness may occur.28 The social component and improvisational building of this activity may also lead to an increased level of oxytocin.29 Oxytocin produced in this state can improve one’s ability to understand the emotions of another and therefore listen more empathically.30 One might then conclude that the social component of storytelling and the flow state that can accompany play increase one’s ability to achieve peak experience and better understand the other with empathic listening.
LSP also facilitates critical self-reflection by prompting participants to reframe the definition of a problem through the creation of a metaphor (ie, a LEGO model). As participants explain their models to the other participants, the reassessment of how one poses problems orients to perceive, know, believe, feel, and act22 surfaces during the creation, questioning, and modification to the LEGO models or in the metaphors that represent the storyteller’s complex idea more simply.22 The connection between metaphor, critical reflection, and transformative learning emerges in “the recognition, identification, and creation of metaphors by adult learners.”31
The social process involved in the storytelling element of LSP also fosters transformative learning.32 As participants share their personal experience in the stories used to explain their models, the listeners respond with authentic curiosity and care. The conveyance of one’s story through the 3-dimensional metaphor can enhance the others’ ability to listen empathically.
The process becomes powerful when the listeners pose questions to clarify the storyteller’s experience. Collectively, all parties seek further depth, clarity, breadth, and experiment with new meaning.
Lastly, imagination is an integral part of understanding the unknown and making meaning.33 The process of physically building ideas via Lego models allows the storyteller’s embodied knowledge to surface through their hands rather than in their mind, leading them in the thinking process.34 Engaging the imagination and creativity inherent to artistic expression takes us “out of our heads and into our bodies, hearts, and souls in ways that allow us to connect more deeply with self and others.”33 This medium and method enables participants to create and reflect on a physical thing that could represent their unconscious, emotional, and intuitive ways of knowing. One does not need to possess expert artistic skills to fully express themselves, because LEGO provides pieces to click together and assign a personal or shared story, meaning, and metaphor.
By critically reflecting through the construction of metaphors and the story listeners asking open-ended ORID questions to aid in the deconstruction of surfaced assumptions, storytellers may then physically change their represented assumptions to a more ideal, tested, and validated configuration. By building new metaphors and identities through this medium, one might now hold the story, or idea as object, and no longer remain subject to it.
To What End?
To what end do we tell, share, and listen to others and their stories? Stories can help in healing the storyteller, as well as provide learning for the listener and storyteller alike. Let’s not forget the possibility for strengthening everyday relationships by providing the gift to your partner of feeling heard. For the storyteller, the structure acts as an enabler for an optimal experience and allows them to truly feel heard. And in feeling heard, they gain objectivity and perspective to the story—by surfacing then testing assumptions through questioning and critical reflection. By purposefully practicing listening and trusting in a process that encourages story listening, transformative learning can emerge.
As professionals, listening becomes both a diagnostic tool and the intervention. In listening, the facilitator creates an environment ripe for learning for the storyteller and other story listeners. And the act of creating a structure for others to participate in the listening allows them to delve into their own transformative experience. Hearing the stories of others allows for the recognition of options for new roles, relationships, and actions as well as examples for implementing their own plan.
References
1. | O’Hara, M . Person-centered approach as conscientizacao: the works of Carl Rogers and Paulo Freire. J Humanist Psychol. 1989;29(1):11–35. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
2. | Jonas-Simpson, CM. The experience of being listened to: a human becoming study with music. Nurs Sci Q. 2003;16(3):232–8. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
3. | Jagosh, J, Boudreau, JD, Steinert, Y, MacDonald, ME, Ingram, L. The importance of physician listening from the patients’ perspective: enhancing diagnosis, healing, and the doctor–patient relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;85(3):369–374. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
4. | Collins, S. D . Interpersonal communication: Listening and responding. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning; 2009. Google Scholar |
5. | Torbert, WR . Action Inquiry: The Secret of Timely and Transforming Leadership. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 2004. Google Scholar |
6. | Drake, DB. Narrative Coaching: the Definitive Guide to Bringing New Stories to Life. Petaluma, CA: CNC Press; 2018. Google Scholar |
7. | Rock, D. SCARF : A brain-based model for collaborating with and influencing others. NeuroLeadership J. 2008;1(1):44–52. Google Scholar |
8. | Stephens, GJ, Silbert, LJ, Hasson, U. Speaker–listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(32):14425–14430. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
9. | Eisenberger, NI, Lieberman, MD, Williams, KD. Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science. 2003;302(5643):290–292. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
10. | Brookfield, S . Teaching for critical thinking. Int J Adult Vocation Educ Technol (IJAVET). 2013;4(1):1–5. Google Scholar | Crossref |
11. | Wheatley, M . It’s time to listen. In: Lions Roar: Buddhist Wisdom for Our Time. 2002. https://www.lionsroar.com/its-time-to-listen/. Accessed November 12, 2018. Google Scholar |
12. | Institute for Economics & Peace . Global Peace Index 2018: Measuring Peace in a Complex World, Sydney. 2018. http://visionofhumanity.org/reports. Accessed November 12, 2018. Google Scholar |
13. | Hanh, TN . Listening deeply for peace. In: Lions Roar: Buddhist Wisdom for Our Time. September 2018. https://www.lionsroar.com/listening-deeply-for-peace/. Accessed November 12, 2018. Google Scholar |
14. | Waks, LJ . Two types of interpersonal listening. Teach Coll Rec. 2010;112(11):2743–62. Google Scholar |
15. | Maslow, AH . A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review. 1943; 50(4):370–396. Google Scholar | Crossref |
16. | Charon, R . Narrative medicine: a model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust. JAMA. 2001;286(15):1897–1902. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
17. | Coakley, CG, Halone, KK, Wolvin, AD. Perceptions of listening ability across the life-span: Implications for understanding listening competence. Int J Listening. 1996;10(1):21–48. Google Scholar | Crossref |
18. | Jonas-Simpson, C, Mitchell, GJ, Fisher, A, Jones, G, Linscott, J. The experience of being listened to: a qualitative study of older adults in long-term care settings. J Gerontol Nurs. 2006;32(1):46–53. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline |
19. | Van Slyke, EJ . Listening to Conflict: Finding Constructive Solutions to Workplace Disputes. New York, NY: Amacom; 1999. Google Scholar |
20. | Mezirow, J . Transformative learning as discourse. J Transform Educ. 2003;1(1):58–63. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals |
21. | Mezirow, J . Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1991. Google Scholar |
22. | Mezirow, J . How critical reflection triggers transformative learning. In: Jack, Mezirow and Associates eds. Fostering Critical Reflection in Adulthood. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.; 1990;1:20. Google Scholar |
23. | Passmore, J, Fillery-Travis, A. A critical review of executive coaching research: a decade of progress and what’s to come. Coaching. 2011;4(2):70–88. Google Scholar |
24. | Spencer, LJ . Winning Through Participation. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Pub Co; 1989. Google Scholar |
25. | Marsick, VJ, Maltbia, TE. The transformative potential of action learning conversations: Developing critically reflective practice skills. In: J. Mezirow, E. Taylor and Associates eds. Transformative Learning in Practice: Insights from Community, Workplace and Higher Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2009:160–181. Google Scholar |
26. | James, AR . Lego Serious Play: a three-dimensional approach to learning development. J Learn Developm Higher Educ. 2013;(6). Google Scholar |
27. | Peabody, MA, Noyes, S. Reflective boot camp: Adapting LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY® in higher education. Reflective Practice. 2017;18(2):232–243. Google Scholar | Crossref |
28. | Csikszentmihalyi, M . Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Performance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1990. Google Scholar |
29. | Keeler, JR, Roth, EA, Neuser, BL, Spitsbergen, JM, Waters, DJ, Vianney, JM. The neurochemistry and social flow of singing: bonding and oxytocin. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015; 9:518. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline |
30. | Domes, G, Heinrichs, M, Michel, A, Berger, C, Herpertz, SC. Oxytocin improves “mind-reading” in humans. Biological Psychiatry. 2007;61(6):731–733. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.07.015. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline |
31. | Deshler, D. Metaphor analysis: Exorcising social ghosts. In: Jack, Mezirow and Associates eds. Fostering Critical Reflection in Adulthood: A Guide to Transformative and Emancipatory Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1990; 296–313. Google Scholar |
32. | Tyler, JA, Swartz, AL. Storytelling and transformative learning. In: Taylor and Patricia Cranton and Associates eds. The Handbook of Transformative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2012; 455–470. Google Scholar |
33. | Lawrence, R. L. (2012). Transformative learning through artistic expression: Getting out of our heads. In: Taylor and Patricia Cranton and Associates eds. The Handbook of Transformative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 471–485. Google Scholar |
34. | Harel, IE, Papert, SE. Constructionism. Research Reports and Essays. New York, NY: Ablex Publishing; 1985–1990. Google Scholar |